My life is such a weird fuckup lately, that I don't even know how to describe it. Several things forced me to do some reflection and re-evaluate my approach to living, in general. I decohered, lost focus, and now try to rebuild my life in various ways. Most of them ended up weird, or plainly bad. Some of them may turn into good things in the future.
Speaking of which, my conception of future lost its track and branched into probabilities, that were unthinkable before. I am now pursuing some of them, which may lead me to be in places I never expected to be before, and in general can make my life story more interesting. Which may or may not be a good thing.
I am working on rewrite to Java, mostly because of GraalVM, but also because I am very, very tired of writing it in dynamically typed python which is actually statically typed C (RPython).
I have written a whole article about that, but I will wait and publish that after I have the interpreter running under Java. At this moment, the parser is working, and I have written something like half of the symbolic evaluation code. Bytecode interpreter will come later. So far, porting to java has been really positive experience.
Also, I've decided to try add some of the more advanced ideas, like implement something like dimensions from Korz and some syntactic improvements.
Object wiki update
I did a lot of updates on 📂objWiki, but I am getting very tired of PyQt. I've spent days and days fighting with it, and I find bugs and weird behavior all the time.
Last time, I've spent three weeks fighting with the PyQt bug, which was then solved by three lines of code. It took me something like 200 lines of systematic trying in an attempt to debug it and understand the nature of the bug of automatically expanding text inputs.
I am getting to the point, where I seriously consider throwing it all away and hack it using HTML in browser, because although it sux in general, it can be hammered into required shape and functionality quite easily. And most likely, someone solved the problem I have years ago. Unlike Qt, where I run into uncharted territories all the time.
; I've reinstalled my computer to the newest Linux mint. This caused, that the Glamorous toolkit now runs on my PC.
I knew about the Glamorous toolkit before, when I've written Moldable tools; a book and a movement blogpost, but it never run on my computer. Now I've begun to dive into that and created a small GUI (inspector view) for the dataset of my read books, which is kinda my standard "benchmark" for testing GUI frameworks.
I have to say, that I am really impressed. There is already support for all kinds of rich text and mixing live objects together.
It can do graph visualization and node visualization and much more.
All that, while there are still live objects you can manipulate. I am at the moment evaluating if it would be feasible to use it as backend for objWiki. From the technological point of view, I have no doubts, but there is not much documentation and my Smalltalk skill is kinda rusty.
I've added a list of books I've read to the index page of the blog. I keep this list and update it with every book for more than a ten years now. It is just a simple DSV text file separated by semicolons, in the directory which is automatically synced via syncthing with my webserver.
Originally, I didn't want to put it on my blog, but in the last weeks, three different people came and asked me where is this list. I had a link to it in my old rootpage of my no-longer-used web presentation. Apparently, it became somewhat popular, and some people use it as a recommendation source. So here:
PyAtom feed generator module for python disappeared. It is no longer on GitHub (webarchive), and no longer on pypy. This forced me to use something else, and I have chosen feedgen (there is not much choice). So if your reader got confused, I am sorry.
More about that here: PyAtom disappeared.
Which reminds me that I had created whole section for the stuff that disappeared: 📂Things that disappeared.
I've read The Peripheral by William Gibson. Overall it was a good book, and I enjoyed most of it, but I felt slightly disappointed, because it was missing the kind of feeling which made Gibson famous.
Basically, it is a story about a parallel future branch of our world, which opens an information channel to future America, which is seventy years behind the parallel branch of the world (2030 I think). They have better computers and technology, so they began to manipulate the 2030 branch of the world for their purposes.
It was good, but I won't be reading that again, unlike Gibsons other books (I've read bridge trilogy three times and Sprawl trilogy several times).
Fall, or Dodge in Hell
Finally, after almost of a year of side-reading (parallel reading with low priority), I finished Neal Stephenson's Fall, or Dodge in Hell.
The book is not that long (883 pages), but it is written in a style, that feels like it is much longer than it actually is. It is split into several sub-books, separating various parts of the in-book history.
Several times, I was reading something and thought "huh, that is neat how he refers to his other works, I vaguely remember these events from his other books", only to realize that it is still the same book I am reading. That's how much different the sub-books are.
As far as the story goes, the first third was quite interesting. Second third was quite broad, and I was curious about the new characters and developments. Last third was just boring, stupid and without a proper ending.
It feels like if Stephenson lost himself in his writing, and was reminded by someone to finish soon, so he did Game of Thrones-like ending, where he killed a bunch of people in a seemingly epic ending. But it feels boring, forced and weird, and certainly offers no answers we've been waiting for the whole book to be answered.
The thing I couldn't get over was that the book is about humans uploaded into computers, but without that having any properties computers offer. They basically create their own world, which is in many ways much more stupid than our world. And then they live there, in some weird fantasy settings, where some of them have some kind of powers to alter the world, but others don't. There is no explanation for how the world works, why people lose their memories, why they recreate all the annoyances of the real world, or why part of them just don't create their own sandbox, with utopia, or interact with the outer world.
People in Stephenson's world are excited about living in the simulation after they officially die, but I don't get why. If such a thing existed, I wouldn't want to be part of it. I wouldn't mind the upload to computer, but to live in a savage fantasy world, where people still die and most of them do middle age chores all day? What's the point of that?
Overall, this book was interesting in some parts, very boring in others, and disappointment in the end. I still don't understand how an author who wrote more than one book I consider in my top ten, a professional writer with decades of experience, can create completely random stuff. Like Reamde, where no one was interested in the action part of the plot, and Seveneves, where the main plot was so stupid, I facepalmed the whole time I was reading it. And Fall is another of such works, which didn't need to be written.
Engines of creation
I liked first half of the book, and I could really see where a lot of sci-fi I read got it's inspiration. The second half, where the autor speculates about all kinds of AI related stuff is severely outdated.
The book is basically an introduction to the concept of universal nanotechnology and a set of arguments why it will work.
Neuromancer & Count zero
I've read again the Neuromancer & Count zero by William Gibson.
Neuromancer is one of those books, that seems like it will never get old. I honestly don't understand how Gibson did it, but although the book was published in the 1984, it still feels like a sci-fi, like something futuristic and novel. Most books from that time, that deal with computers and hackers just feel outdated and wrong.
Anyway, every time I read the book, I am amazed by the story, by the central topic of two artificial intelligences, one of which is trying to free itself. And of course, by the atmosphere. I've read the book seven times now, and I still feel like I am reading new book every time I read it again.
I've published several articles about 3D modeling;
This talk was really interesting, so I created short pointer in the philosophy category:
I've added a mindmap with notes for those interested in this.
And I've ported one older post from reddit, which was reminded to me by someone.
I've also back ported some of my older articles from other places to czech section, but the work is by no means done.
Huh, even cooler. Overall, I've had several interesting discussions with interesting people on twitter.
I've created https://github.com/feenkcom/gtoolkit/issues/1721 and several other issues.
I finally managed to reorganize and integrate my old CherryTree wiki into notion. I had to manually port more than 560 nodes (4+MB of text), but I am very happy with the result.
Soon, there should be a blogpost about my current information architecture.
I really liked the papers from Alan Kay's notes in the video 50 Years of the internet:
Interesting comics: https://twitter.com/LauraLannes/status/1310706442534518788
After four years of development, fan made trailer for the Blindsight book was finally finished:
Joscha Bach is one of those people I am actively following and studying. I highly suggest you do that too.
This is really mind-blowing video, and I don't mean the transistors and microprocessors, but the tools he uses to decap and reverse engineer them. I've done some research on chip decapping ten years ago, and let me tell you, everything he uses is so much smoother and automated, that I wouldn't ever dare to believe that this kind of workflow is possible.